One of the main reasons why there can be such an adverse reaction to the foreskin is due to the issue of ‘Smegma’ (Greek = soap), which is the genital secretion that’s common to all mammals, both male and female, and is probably the most misunderstood and unjustifiably maligned and vilified substance produced by the human body. In females, smegma collects around the clitoris and in the folds of the labia minora, whilst in males, it collects underneath the foreskin or in the preputial space. It’s only in human males however that smegma seems to be SO offensive as to warrant circumcision to negate its existence. Smegma is made up of a combination of exfoliated epithelial cells, discharged skin oils and moisture and it’s been found to contain 26.6% fats and 13.3% proteins, which is consistent with epithelial debris. Newly produced smegma has a smooth, moist texture and is thought to be rich in squalene and contain prostatic and seminal secretions, desquamated epithelial cells, and the mucin content of the urethral glands of Littré. Smegma is an emollient which is benign, beneficial and necessary because it moisturizes the glans and keeps it smooth, soft, and supple. It has antibacterial and antiviral properties which keep the penis clean and healthy. There is NO evidence whatsoever to support the suggestion that smegma causes penile cancer.
Smegma if allowed to grow stale can have a pungent aroma (commonly compared to cheese in males or fish in females)…the odour stemming from the bacterial breakdown of the oils. It is moist in its texture until it is allowed to accumulate, when it takes on a characteristic appearance, which can be best described as ‘cheesy’ or paste like and it can vary in color from almost white to a darker shade, depending on a person’s skin tone. Washing regularly with soap and water is the obvious solution to this natural process. Surely there has to be something seriously wrong and twisted if certain factions within the so called ‘civilized’ world find this natural bodily function so abhorrent and offensive as to circumcise foreskins to resolve the issue of smegma. Does anyone cut off the ears because they produce wax? Or cut off noses because they produce mucus? If girls and women can manage to deal with their genital hygiene, then surely boys and men can likewise be shown and taught how to manage their penile hygiene. This can be seen to be quite a sexist position to assume that males are ‘incapable’ of managing their bodies, specifically the cleanliness of their ‘nether’ regions. It is utterly preposterous that human males in the 21st century continue to have their foreskins cut off because of the ‘fear’ and seeming ‘neurosis’ concerning smegma, which is the product of the body’s normal functioning which can be simply washed off with soap and water.
Researchers at the University of Manchester have discovered that the human foreskin has apocrine glands which are specialized glands that produce pheromones, nature’s chemical messengers. Even though many people find the odour of smegma offensive, there are some who are actually turned on by it. There may be pheromonal (sexual attractant) properties present in the smegma secretions. Research into body scents and sexual attraction have shown a correlation between facial attractiveness and an attractiveness of scent. However there doesn’t seem to be any conclusive research into pheromonal smells of sexual secretions and what their implications might be. Mammals are known to communicate with their scent and humans are no different. However, the seemingly ‘squeemishness’ and negativity that many people show towards strong or ‘offensive’ body odours, along with the trend to being over ‘sanitised’ and their need for ‘pleasant’ and non-offensive odours, then it’s very difficult to definitively place what, if any, the pheromonal role of smegma might actually be. This is one area that human sexual behaviourists ought to be doing some major definitive research on.
The propaganda that smegma caused cervical cancer had been one reason used to advocate for male circumcision, but this argument was invalidated when in the 1970’s it was discovered that the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) was most likely to be the cause of cervical cancers. It has been known of women who specifically had their sons circumcised to ‘prevent’ them from causing cervical cancer to women. This was yet another false ‘myth’ attributed to the maligned foreskin, whereby many males had their foreskins severed because of this very reason.
As far as penile hygiene is concerned, it may be worth mentioning that there are many intact men who urinate through their foreskins, that is, they don’t retract their foreskins when urinating and that the sensation of warm urine flowing past the foreskin produces rather pleasant sensations. Therefore, there is an inevitably small amount of urine which gets trapped in the preputial space. Some men wipe their penis after urinating, and others don’t. Additionally, if masturbation and / or sexual intercourse is occurring there may also be semen which is likewise trapped in the preputial space. If daily penile hygiene isn’t being practiced, then the combination of urine, semen and smegma, can most likely become an aromatic challenge, particularly if there is a partner involved. Ideally, washing underneath the foreskin on a daily basis is the most obvious way of managing the hygiene of an intact penis. This is common sense, but there are men and boys who have never been shown or taught how to maintain the hygiene of their genitals. If there is a partner involved, it is a sign of respect and courtesy to ensure that the penis does not get to the stage whereby it’s emitting strong aromas, but it depends on the partner, as this may well be okay with them. Penile hygiene is a sensible and simple process and it should NOT be a reason to cut off foreskins.